This forum is in read-only mode for archive purposes, please use our new forum at https://community.justflight.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Just Chat > Just Chat - General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - David Attenborough meets the president.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

David Attenborough meets the president.

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
MartinW View Drop Down
Moderator in Command
Moderator in Command
Avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Points: 26722
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MartinW Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: David Attenborough meets the president.
    Posted: 28 Jun 2015 at 10:34am
Must have been quite a thrill for David Attenborough to be asked to visit the Whitehouse. And no, it wasn't a case of "come and have a look around". It was an admiring president seeking his council.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-33303042

In the video, the president and David talk about clean energy.

if you want to watch the entire meeting, it's on BBC1 at 10:30 tonight.





Back to Top
stevemac View Drop Down
Check-In Staff
Check-In Staff


Joined: 30 Jan 2014
Location: Melbourne
Points: 14
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stevemac Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Jul 2015 at 10:46pm
" today's renewable-energy technologies aren't a viable solution for reducing CO2 levels, and governments should divert their green subsidies into R&D aimed at better answers" - Bill Gates

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/06/26/gates_renewable_energy_cant_do_the_job_gov_should_switch_green_subsidies_into_rd/

"the cost of using current renewables such as solar panels and windfarms to produce all or most power would be "beyond astronomical". At present very little power comes from renewables: in the UK just 5.2 per cent, the majority of which is dubiously-green biofuel burning1 rather than renewable 'leccy - and even so, energy bills have surged and will surge further as a result."

The ex-software overlord stated that the Guardian's scheme of everyone refusing to invest in oil and gas companies would have "little impact". He also poured scorn on another notion oft-touted as a way of making renewable energy more feasible, that of using batteries to store intermittent supplies from solar or wind.

There’s no battery technology that’s even close to allowing us to take all of our energy from renewables," he said, pointing out - as we've noted on these pages before - that it's necessary "to deal not only with the 24-hour cycle but also with long periods of time where it’s cloudy and you don’t have sun or you don’t have wind."


Back to Top
MartinW View Drop Down
Moderator in Command
Moderator in Command
Avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Points: 26722
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MartinW Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jul 2015 at 1:27pm
Quote " today's renewable-energy technologies aren't a viable solution for reducing CO2 levels, and governments should divert their green subsidies into R&D aimed at better answers" - Bill Gates


Well clearly they are, in that any energy generated from renewables will reduce CO2 emissions. Enough? No, so lets have more.

Last year global CO2 emissions actually stalled rather than increasing as expected. It seems we can thank China, it seems their commitment to a low carbon future resulted in a 5% drop in emissions.

We do have to be cautious of course, because a drop in any one financial quarter isn't exactly a dramatic change in direction. But for Gates to completely write off todays renewable technology is silly.

So yes, todays renewable energy technology can indeed make a difference. The issue is implementation, we need more of it.

Quote Renewables are finally becoming a globally significant source of power, according to a United Nations Environment Programme report released in March by Frankfurt School UNEP Centre and Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

Driven by rapid expansion in developing countries, new installations of carbon-free renewable power plants in 2014 surpassed 100,000 megawatts of capacity for the first time, according to the Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment report. It appears that renewable energy is now entering the market at a scale that is relevant in energy industry terms – and at a price that is competitive with fossil fuels.


http://www.theguardian.com/vital-signs/2015/apr/20/renewable-energy-global-trends-solar-power

Currently the fossil fuel industry gets between 500 billion and one triilon dollars in subsdies per year. Just imagine how renewable energy would be transformed with the same investment.

Back to Top
MartinW View Drop Down
Moderator in Command
Moderator in Command
Avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Points: 26722
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MartinW Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jul 2015 at 1:36pm
Quote “There’s no battery technology that’s even close to allowing us to take all of our energy from renewables," he said, pointing out - as we've noted on these pages before - that it's necessary "to deal not only with the 24-hour cycle but also with long periods of time where it’s cloudy and you don’t have sun or you don’t have wind."


He's not telling us anything we don't already know. Except that the point of course, is to invest in a wide range of renewable technologies to off-set somewhat the periodic nature of power generation.


Quote Gates says he'll personally put his money where his mouth is. He's apparently invested $1bn of his own cash in low-carbon energy R&D already, and “over the next five years, there’s a good chance that will double,” he said.


And this is where Bill Gate's and his hypocrisy arrive.... wow, well done Bill, you say you'll invest one billion in renewables. And simultaneously he and his "Gates Foundation" hold billions in investments in the fossil fuel industry!!!

Quote The charity run by Bill and Melinda Gates, who say the threat of climate change is so serious that immediate action is needed, held at least $1.4bn (£1bn) of investments in the world’s biggest fossil fuel companies, according to a Guardian analysis of the charity’s most recent tax filing in 2013.


Quote Bill McKibben, who leads the fast-growing Go Fossil Free campaign, said: “The Gates Foundation has worked so hard to grapple with global poverty. But at the same time they’re investing in the same companies that drive climate change, which endless studies now show is one of the key factors behind ... global poverty. The developing world deserves better than this kind of tunnel vision.”


http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/mar/19/gates-foundation-has-14bn-in-fossil-fuels-investments-guardian-analysis

And nope! When asked to no longer support the fossil fuel industry he refused!

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jun/26/gates-to-invest-2bn-in-breakthrough-renewable-energy-projects

Quote The ex-software overlord stated that the Guardian's scheme of everyone refusing to invest in oil and gas companies would have "little impact".


Yes, you would say that wouldn't you Bill, given you have billions invested in the fossil fuel industry yourself. Divest Bill we say, divest, sell your fossil fuel assets! Err... no, err... that wouldn't work he tells us.

I think it's pretty clear what Gates is up to. He's investing in renewable research and development as a business opportunity. But simultaneously of course he wishes to hang on to his fossil fuel investments. This is a business opportunity for him, nothing altruistic!





Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down