This forum is in read-only mode for archive purposes, please use our new forum at https://community.justflight.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Just Chat > Just Chat - General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 'Critical phase' for Iter fusion dream
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

'Critical phase' for Iter fusion dream

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
MartinW View Drop Down
Moderator in Command
Moderator in Command
Avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Points: 26722
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MartinW Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 'Critical phase' for Iter fusion dream
    Posted: 19 Sep 2013 at 4:53pm
 

The world's largest bid to harness the power of fusion has entered a "critical" phase in southern France.

The Iter project at Cadarache in Provence is receiving the first of about one million components for its experimental reactor.

 

Now the Iter reactor will put that to the test. Known as a "tokamak", it is based on the design of Jet, a European pilot project at Culham in Oxfordshire.

It will involve creating a plasma of superheated gas reaching temperatures of more than 200 million C - conditions hot enough to force deuterium and tritium atoms to fuse together and release energy.

The whole process will take place inside a giant magnetic field in the shape of a ring - the only way such extreme heat can be contained.

The plant at JET has managed to achieve fusion reactions in very short bursts but required the use of more power than it was able to produce.

The reactor at Iter is on a much larger scale and is designed to generate 10 times more power - 500 MW - than it will consume.

 
 
Tokamak construction   Iter
 
 
Fusion reactor
 
 
Back to Top
hifly View Drop Down
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Avatar

Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Location: Hastings UK
Points: 1012
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hifly Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Sep 2013 at 6:07pm
Hi Martin, I'm sorry I didn't pick up on your recent suggestions for topics here but I've been working my little b... very hard lately and have little brain power left at the end of the day.
 
200 million C, now that is hot.
 
Interesting; we're going to need this energy source in the future and it's gratifying to know that despite the difficulties, complexity, cost and timescale, that we have the ability to make almost impossible dreams a reality.
 
Or at least try, after all this is an experiment.
 
Let's hope it's safe. 200 million C, that would burn a big hole.
 
Thanks for the lead Martin.
 
Best,
 
 
Must Fly!
Back to Top
Jim View Drop Down
P/UT
P/UT
Avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Location: Portsmouth UK
Points: 238
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Sep 2013 at 6:34pm
Let's hope it's safe. 200 million C, that would burn a big hole.
A quick way to get to Australia.Wink
 
Jim.
Back to Top
hifly View Drop Down
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Avatar

Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Location: Hastings UK
Points: 1012
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hifly Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Sep 2013 at 8:11pm
Originally posted by Jim Jim wrote:

Let's hope it's safe. 200 million C, that would burn a big hole.
A quick way to get to Australia.Wink
 
Jim.
Be one hell of a barbie.
 
Seriously let's hope this works for our children, grandchildren.
Must Fly!
Back to Top
MartinW View Drop Down
Moderator in Command
Moderator in Command
Avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Points: 26722
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MartinW Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Sep 2013 at 9:36am
Quote Let's hope it's safe. 200 million C, that would burn a big hole.
 
Well a lot safer than fission.
 
There's no chance of any kind of detonation. There is some radiation to deal with but it's barely an issue compared with fission.
 
Hot yes, the plasma is contained by magnetic fields. If those fields failed, it would be a disaster for the reactor but not an issue in terms of any kind of environmental disaster. I doubt there would even be much risk to personnel.
 
We have achieved ignition before of course, at Jet. But Jet required more energy in than it provided in terms of output. If it all goes to plan, this guy should generate more energy than we put in. If so, if successful, it will be the first step toward a commercial reactor.
 
Hopefully the old joke that fusion is always 30 years away will be a thing of the past.
 
Who knows where the future will lead though. There are amazing breakthroughs on the way in regard to photovoltaic cells, energy storage etc. It is conceivable, that in the future we may not require as many full scale reactors as we envisage.  
 
 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down