This forum is in read-only mode for archive purposes, please use our new forum at https://community.justflight.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Just Chat > Just Chat - General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Colleague defends Climate Scientst
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Colleague defends Climate Scientst
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
MartinW View Drop Down
Moderator in Command
Moderator in Command
Avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Points: 26722 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MartinW Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Dec 2009 at 10:13am
Revealed here, a first on Just Flight...
 
 
 
Yep, this is it folks. If you see a man wandering aimlessly through the streets, with a strange look in his eyes, with the above bar-code tattooed on his forehead... another one has escaped. Unhappy
 
Back to Top
FSaddict View Drop Down
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Avatar

Joined: 02 Apr 2008
Points: 1067 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FSaddict Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Dec 2009 at 12:12pm
Originally posted by VulcanB2 VulcanB2 wrote:

If you know anything about a subject, you know if what you're reading is reasonable or not.

The other thing is you *NEVER* rely on a single source for information, regardless of what that  source is.

Best regards,
Vulcan.


  1. en.wikipedia.org...
  2. london-lez.org...
  3. science.nasa.gov...
  4. en.wikipedia.org...
  5. en.wikipedia.org...
  6. en.wikipedia.org...
  7. en.wikipedia.org...
  8. hypertextbook.com...
[sarcasm]Yeh that's LOADS of different sources[/sarcasm] 62.5% wikipedia

Originally posted by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-Wikipedia_disclaimers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-Wikipedia_disclaimers wrote:


Wikipedia is an online open-content collaborative encyclopedia, that is, a voluntary association of individuals and groups working to develop a common resource of human knowledge. The structure of the project allows anyone with an Internet connection to alter its content. Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information.

That is not to say that you will not find valuable and accurate information in Wikipedia; much of the time you will. However, Wikipedia cannot guarantee the validity of the information found here. The content of any given article may recently have been changed, vandalized or altered by someone whose opinion does not correspond with the state of knowledge in the relevant fields. Note that most other encyclopedias and reference works also have similar disclaimers.

Wikipedia itself states in its disclaimer why it is not valid as a source for scientific evidence!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down