Lockerbie Bomber Released |
Post Reply | Page 123 4> |
Author | ||
VulcanB2
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 13365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 20 Aug 2009 at 1:27pm |
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/video_and_audio/news_channel_live/7459669.stm
He's been released on compassionate grounds. Kudos to Scotland for not bowing to US Government pressure. Curious that the UK Government are keeping silent on anything agreed with the US. UK - puppet of US Gov. Best regards, Vulcan. |
||
VulcanB2
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 13365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/8211596.stm
Let's not forget that this is in the wake of the US shooting down an Iranian passenger aircraft. Best regards, |
||
Edward Longe
Chief Pilot Joined: 25 Aug 2008 Location: West Mids Points: 5138 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The thing about America is that if they are attacked they expect the people responsable to be shot within 20 mins (example) however if they attack others the victims should just put up with it. About them demanding he should stay in prision show that they have become to big for their boots.
|
||
CAA= Cash Again,Again! |
||
roachy
Chief Pilot Joined: 03 May 2008 Location: London Points: 1038 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Clearly the American people and most of the government (remember, most of them are right wing rich old men who were there long before the election of more socialist Obama) don't see/aren't willing to see that the man is nothing more than a scapegoat. By saying what they're saying, and doing what they're doing, they're not punising the guilty; merely making their ignorance easier and easier to see.
|
||
Luke Roach
|
||
Dambuster
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 3428 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
He's in the air right now ON A PLANE... a terrorist on an aircraft... shoot his plane down then see how he feels about that!
Why didn't they let him choke to death in jail? |
||
|
||
In Kontrol
P1 Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Location: Cumbria, UK Points: 711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
They don't know who the REAL bomber is, that's why. |
||
Hot_Charlie
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 1839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Lucky chap. The bomb certainly had his name on it. How it came to be put there by him is another story, but one thinks that he took the risk and probably got paid to do it. Better release all paid/contract killers then if they get ill...
|
||
TomA320
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Location: Perth Scotland Points: 10235 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
He will probably have somthing to do with it though. His cloths were found in the same suitcase as the bomb.
|
||
VulcanB2
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 13365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/south_of_scotland/8197370.stm
How can someone show remorse if they had nothing to do with it? He sure as hell doesn't look like he did it. He looks like someone who is deeply depressed and stressed about his situation. A psychopath wouldn't *appear* to care (it's written all over his face - psychopaths don't show that kind of emotion). I do seriously think he is a scapegoat. I don't think that lightly. Why was his co-accused not found guilty? If I was him I'd be wary of getting on that aircraft. Best regards, Vulcan. |
||
Aircraft Aviation
Chief Pilot Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Points: 2149 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
They weren't necessarily his clothes. They were Maltese clothing supposedly purchased by a Libian Government representitive.
To be honest, if he is responsible for the bombings, I think he should face the same fate as the people he was convicted of murdering.
|
||
Hot_Charlie
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 1839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'm very much certain that he placed the bomb in his suitcase, then placed his suitcase on the aeroplane at Frankfurt. What I'm saying is he threw his rights out of the window when he was employed to do the deed. |
||
Dambuster
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 3428 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Then why did they convict him in the first place? That guy who calls himself a judge, what sort of morality is he talking about? "compassionate grounds", I thought one doesn't even talk to terrorists, now they show compassion? |
||
|
||
ConcordeGuy
Chief Pilot Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Location: Peterborough UK Points: 3734 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Should of let the Knaff rot - I bet they're praising him as a "hero" in Libya
|
||
Rides a 1999 Kawasaki ZZR600
|
||
Flightboy
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Location: Essex, UK Points: 7396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Odd as he was found guilty based on evidence not on conspiracy theories that appeared years later. If there was any proof other than the evidence that convicted him he would have never been convicted or would have been released Flightboy |
||
Slopey
Moderator in Command AirHauler Developer Joined: 11 Jun 2008 Points: 8280 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Actually he was convicted on what was described as the "thin end of circumstantial evidence". There was no hard evidence presented, and nothing about the Pan-Am break in on the morning of the flight etc etc.
|
||
AirHauler Developer
For AH2 queries - PLEASE USE THE EA Forums as the first port of call. |
||
Hot_Charlie
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 1839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Back in Libya to a heroes welcome. Oh dear.
There's a reason for centralised government - it stops bit part politicians from taking important jobs in mickey mouse devolved governments and having to make big decisions affecting international relations; in this case incurring the wrath of the USA. Nice one. Prat. Hope Kenny MacAskill (that's the Scottish Justice Sec for the rest of you who had no idea who he was either) enjoyed his 5 minutes in front of the worlds media. |
||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The bomb certainly had his name on it Allegedly... even one of the Lockerbie victim’s parents believes him to be innocent. He will probably have somthing to do with it though. His cloths were found in the same suitcase as the bomb. Probably means nothing, proof is required in British law. Someone could plant a bomb in your suitcase. Actually he was convicted on what was described as the "thin end of circumstantial evidence". There was no hard evidence presented, and nothing about the Pan-Am break in on the morning of the flight etc etc. Well said Slopey, it's all very well for you guys to make sweeping statements without knowing the facts. Over emotional outbursts from the perspective of limited knowledge of the circumstances are pointless. |
||
Flightboy
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Location: Essex, UK Points: 7396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
He was found guilty under our laws no matter how you gloss it so he was guilty FACT And i dont blame america for being miffed, hardly justice for the familys of the victims watching him get a heroes welcome, least they have the knowledge hes dying a slow hopefully painful death Flightboy |
||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Was found guilty under our laws no mtter how you gloss it so he was guilty FACT
Guilty because a judge said so and guilty in reality are obviously two different concepts. Otherwise the world wouldn't have had a plethora of innocent people not only incarcerated but executed also.
Dr Jim Swire, who's daughter Flora died on PanAm flight 103, is convinced that Al Megrahi was not responsible for the Lockerbie bombing Many are suspicious that the release was 'brokered' behind the scenes to avoid the embarrassment of an appeal.
I notice Flighty has no trouble backing other highly implausible conspiracy theories like 9/11, but when we come across one that's plausible he disagrees vehemently.
|
||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
And another...
If you are going to lock someone up for their entire lives, you need to be absolutely certain they are the guilty parties, not base your conviction on the... "thin end of circumstantial evidence".
That's not what British law should be about.
|
||
Post Reply | Page 123 4> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |