This forum is in read-only mode for archive purposes, please use our new forum at https://community.justflight.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Just Chat > Just Chat - General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - You thought Hubble was good...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

You thought Hubble was good...

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
MartinW View Drop Down
Moderator in Command
Moderator in Command
Avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Points: 26722
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MartinW Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: You thought Hubble was good...
    Posted: 02 May 2009 at 10:53am
...well the James Webb is going to be a cracker!
 
 
Quote

The most distant cosmic explosion ever recorded would have made a fascinating target for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), according to scientists now building the successor to the Hubble Space Telescope.

The cataclysmic detonation reported this week is the most far-flung object in the Universe yet seen.

BBC R4: THE NEW GALILEOS
Mirror%20model%20%28Nasa%29

It was a class of celestial object known as a gamma-ray blast. At a distance of 13 billion light-years away, the blast was so remote that today's telescopes were stretched to their limits in revealing much information about it.

Nasa's James Webb is designed with the purpose of imaging and studying this realm of the cosmos - and beyond - in extraordinary detail.

It is scheduled for launch in 2013.

To see so far, the observatory will be the space agency's largest and most technically challenging telescope mission to date.

Its primary mirror is 6.5m (21ft) across - close to three times wider than Hubble's.

 
Herschel%20%28BBC%29
Hubble views some near-infrared wavelengths. James Webb will seek longer wavelengths
 
Back to Top
FSaddict View Drop Down
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Avatar

Joined: 02 Apr 2008
Points: 1067
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FSaddict Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 May 2009 at 11:02am
Hubble would have been better if it's mirror hadn't been out by a few nanometers (it couldn't focus properly and images appeared fuzzy) but clearly this will be better anyway.
Back to Top
VulcanB2 View Drop Down
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Avatar

Joined: 02 Apr 2008
Points: 13365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VulcanB2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 May 2009 at 2:41pm
I'll wait until it is in orbit and the first images are in.

Best regards,
Vulcan.
Back to Top
MartinW View Drop Down
Moderator in Command
Moderator in Command
Avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Points: 26722
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MartinW Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 May 2009 at 6:00pm
Originally posted by FSaddict FSaddict wrote:

Hubble would have been better if it's mirror hadn't been out by a few nanometers (it couldn't focus properly and images appeared fuzzy) but clearly this will be better anyway.
 
No, the defect in the Hubble mirror was corrected by a  shuttle mission. They fitted corrective optics, specs if you like. Do't think there's any evidence that it was in some way a lesser telescope after the fix. On the contrary, the images returned have been exemplary.
Back to Top
FSaddict View Drop Down
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Avatar

Joined: 02 Apr 2008
Points: 1067
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FSaddict Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 May 2009 at 9:00pm
Originally posted by MartinW MartinW wrote:

Originally posted by FSaddict FSaddict wrote:

Hubble would have been better if it's mirror hadn't been out by a few nanometers (it couldn't focus properly and images appeared fuzzy) but clearly this will be better anyway.
 
No, the defect in the Hubble mirror was corrected by a  shuttle mission. They fitted corrective optics, specs if you like.


Oops didn't know that Wacko
Back to Top
VulcanB2 View Drop Down
Chief Pilot
Chief Pilot
Avatar

Joined: 02 Apr 2008
Points: 13365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VulcanB2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 2:31pm
Originally posted by MartinW MartinW wrote:

Originally posted by FSaddict FSaddict wrote:

Hubble would have been better if it's mirror hadn't been out by a few nanometers (it couldn't focus properly and images appeared fuzzy) but clearly this will be better anyway.
 
No, the defect in the Hubble mirror was corrected by a  shuttle mission. They fitted corrective optics, specs if you like. Do't think there's any evidence that it was in some way a lesser telescope after the fix. On the contrary, the images returned have been exemplary.

They're on the fence over this. They were saying that correction is not as good as the optics being correct in the first place, but it is close enough.

Best regards,
Vulcan.
Back to Top
MartinW View Drop Down
Moderator in Command
Moderator in Command
Avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Points: 26722
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MartinW Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 7:39pm

I think with the fix or any fix, it can never be 100% as good as a perfect mirror in the first instance. I would imagine there has to be some losses as a result of the extra lens elements. But as you say, hardly enough to make a difference.

 

When you see the images the Hubble has provided, including the amazing deep field shots of what we assumed was an empty patch of space, the long exposure revealing countless galaxies that were previously invisible, it brings it home to you how successful the device has been.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down