'Unbreakable' encryption unveiled |
Post Reply |
Author | ||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 10 Oct 2008 at 4:40pm |
|
It's quantum encryption Pointy!
Perfect secrecy has come a step closer with the launch of the world's first computer network protected by unbreakable quantum encryption at a scientific conference in Vienna. The network connects six locations across Vienna and in the nearby town of St Poelten, using 200 km of standard commercial fibre optic cables. Quantum cryptography is completely different from the kinds of security schemes used on computer networks today. These are typically based on complex mathematical procedures which are extremely hard for outsiders to crack but not impossible given sufficient computing resources or time. But quantum systems use the laws of quantum theory, which have been shown to be inherently unbreakable.
|
||
ross1562
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Location: Carterton, UK. Points: 1011 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Is it actually unbreakable...........??? or can they just not break it!!!!!!!!
|
||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
You've lost me there Ross.
|
||
FSaddict
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 1067 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
he asked if whether they know it is unbreakable, or are they yet to break it themselves?
|
||
VulcanB2
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 13365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi,
Actually it IS breakable, only you know that it has been intercepted. The other thing is that it means that other methods of snooping will be employed as the data is being made harder and harder to get at. Given unlimited resources (which you must assume your attacker to have), then this is actually perfectly breakable, and you wouldn't know. Best regards, Vulcan. |
||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It’s based on the Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, so it's impossible to eavesdrop without revealing yourself. As soon as an intruder tries to listen in on the quantum exchange photons become scrambled signaling the attack, the system then shuts down automatically. As long as the system shuts down in response to the signaled intrusion it's secure. I would imagine that only tampering with the very heart of the system would render it vulnerable. But then nothing can ever protect a system from those with access and technical knowledge reconfiguring the system, but only the designers would be able to do that I would have thought. This is only one example of the way quantum encryption can be applied. In answer to Ross's question, it is unbreakable in the ordinary sense of the term, in that it is literally impossible to eavesdrop without detection. So an external intruder wouldn't be able to listen in.
|
||
VulcanB2
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 13365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
This assumes the eavesdropper is passive. If the eavesdropper is active, then they can perfectly recreate the encrypted messages, and the intended recipient would have no idea it was intercepted.
This highlights another problem I have with the article - they're mixing terms. Being unbreakable vs. being unable to eavesdrop without being detected are two quite different problems. Best regards, Vulcan. |
||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
This assumes the eavesdropper is passive. If the eavesdropper is active, then they can perfectly recreate the encrypted messages, and the intended recipient would have no idea it was intercepted. can you elaborate on that Pointy? If you were intending to counter it, how would you do it?
|
||
ross1562
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Location: Carterton, UK. Points: 1011 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
VulcanB2
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 13365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
@Ross: It's not that difficult really. The real genius is in the maths, and there are only around 25 people in world good enough to do that bit.
This is a public forum. As such, I can't write that here. Best regards, Vulcan. |
||
ross1562
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Location: Carterton, UK. Points: 1011 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Damn, i am obviously the 26th person!!
|
||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
This is a public forum. As such, I can't write that here.
Pointy can now break quantum encryption.
Public forum my bottom.
How would an 'active' user do this?
I pretty sure you aren't a genius, and that the revelation you bestow upon us wouldn't be so shocking that the authorities descended on you in a flash. If you have knowledge of such things so do thousands of others.
I'm also sure that this wouldn't be hailed as a breakthrough if someone like our old pal Pointy has the knowledge to crack it.
Elaborate on the passive and active terms. What do they mean in terms of encryption?
|
||
Magic Man
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Location: South Wales Points: 5336 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I know the secret to life, the universe and everything (not 42 actually)....
...but this is a public forum so I can't write it here.
|
||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
VulcanB2
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 13365 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
No actually - there are laws prohibiting it.
If you knew anything about how the UK views encryption technology, you'd know this. If we were in a room together I could tell you. Best regards, Vulcan. |
||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
So define passive and active in this respect, so that we may better grasp your advanced concepts.
|
||
Magic Man
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Location: South Wales Points: 5336 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It was the light detector attack I was refering to in the other post.
Are you sure it's safe to mention this new attack on the forum Magic?
Just kidding Pointy.
|
||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |