Global Warming

Impossible! But we can say beyond all "reasonable doubt". Denialists like you are never reasonable though.

What bogus graphs. if you mean the original hockey stick graph, then entire web sites were set up just in an attempt to discredit it, the instant the graph was made public. However... while the denialists were doing that, numerous other teams were doing their own research. We now have a plethora of graphs by other researchers, an entire hockey team of graphs. Non identical, but all resembling the original, all agreeing with the basic premise. It's called a consensus.

Remember the planetary examples I wrote here regarding CO2 concentrations of Mars, Earth and Venus, and their various comparisons and statistics?
There is also the small matter of the fact that all planets in the solar system are warming - not just Earth.

If anyone else is reading this they would be laughing at you. If global warming were impossible you wouldn't be alive.

Glad you admit it finally. 

Make your point. So what? Planets may be warming, there are many reasons for such a thing.

And what was the source of your PDF? The problem is, posting phoney science from dubious sources doesn't help anyone.

It isn't even reasonable doubt.

According to you and your denailist friends with ulterior motives, no. But according the consensus of opinion amongst qualified scientists, it is.

Really? I seem to recall they were pulled apart too, for omissions in data they didn't like, and finding the data as presented in the graphs didn't match the source data (where available).

No Vulcan, there's a plethora of similar graphs, many based on different data. They all more or less agree.

More than a dozen subsequent scientific papers, using various statistical techniques and combinations of proxy records, produced reconstructions broadly similar to the original MBH hockey-stick graph, with variations in how flat the pre-20th century "shaft" appears. Almost all of them supported the IPCC conclusion that the warmest decade in 1000 years was probably that at the end of the 20th century.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockey_stick_controversy

You forget a few critical aspects. One, that the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is tiny, that the amount we are adding to it is even smaller

We’ve discussed this several times before. The amount of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere is small, you are correct. But forget MMGW for a second. That small quantity of CO2 in the atmosphere has a profound affect. It enables life to exist on this planet. We know it already generates a green house effect that is potent enough to provide a climate life can exist in.

So a little has a significant effect. Now take that small quantity of CO2 and add our contribution…

Concentrations of CO₂ have increased by more than 35% since industrialisation began, and they are now at their highest for at least 800,000 years

Greenhouse gases are produced naturally and commercially. Both types influence climate change. All the greenhouse gases combined (the main ones being water vapour, CO2, methane and nitrous oxide) are only a tiny part of the atmosphere, making up less than 0.5%. Yet it is scientifically proven that these gases trap heat, keeping the planet 30 °C warmer than it would be otherwise and able to sustain life. Any changes in the levels of these gases, such as those recently brought about by human activity, will have a significant effect on global temperatures. Keeping the climate stable is important for the well-being of the Earth. But there is now very strong evidence that man-made greenhouse gases are causing climate change