Students face fees of up to £9,000 |
Post Reply | Page <12345> |
Author | ||||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Glad I'm too old to worry about this stuff. Apart from worrying about it for my daughter that is.
Me... I'd do open university. And save a ton of money.
|
||||
Hot_Charlie
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 1839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
That's where the "foundation year" comes in, to make up for the poor/lack of A-Levels. I'll really start worrying about uni again in about 16 years time! Some sort of equilibrium may exist again by then. I can understand everybody should have a chance of further education if they wish, but the reality is it's like putting a large proportion of the population in school until 21 or 22, and somehow that has to be funded from the nation's already empty pockets. |
||||
twright
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Location: London UK Points: 3303 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Hopefully it shouldn't affect those who have already started three/four year degree courses! Not that that is at all helpful for future students though. Student life is expensive enough - I am currently at a London university and decided to save a little by living at home and commuting rather than living in halls. I still end up paying around £700 every six months to renew my Oyster Travelcard for my train and tube journey there and back every day! And that's due to rise substantially next year too. |
||||
Kind regards,
Tom |
||||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
That's where the "foundation year" comes in, to make up for the poor/lack of A-Levels. Which sort of negates your point. If you are making up for a lack of A-Levels, then you may be physically residing in a campus... but you aren't doing a full degree for that particular year. So you may as well have gone to night school or any other part time college and got the required A-Levels. |
||||
roachy
Chief Pilot Joined: 03 May 2008 Location: London Points: 1038 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Well shouldn't we all be thanking Boris for maing our lives miseries.
Word has it that the new London buses he's trying to get bought will end up costing 50% more than a standard double decker. And this'll probably translate into a 50% hike in fares, which will infuriate most London bus users, who're on it for the commute and don't care whether it looks cool or not.
We should also thanks Boris' party for this as well - because the Thatcher government deemed it illegal in the 1980's for councils to subsidise public transport. Where I lived (South Yorkshire) this actually translated into a five-fold rise in bus fares overnight when it happened!
|
||||
Luke Roach
|
||||
roachy
Chief Pilot Joined: 03 May 2008 Location: London Points: 1038 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
The only way you or I would be affected would be if we decided to do a Masters at a different university to the one we did the BSc/BA at.
|
||||
Luke Roach
|
||||
roachy
Chief Pilot Joined: 03 May 2008 Location: London Points: 1038 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Like I said before though - you still need the same academic ability as those with full A-levels, otherwise you'll just fail the first year of the actual degree course.
|
||||
Luke Roach
|
||||
roachy
Chief Pilot Joined: 03 May 2008 Location: London Points: 1038 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Not the same thing. Unconditional offers still exist, but the Matriculation offer at Cambridge certainly isn't unconditional.
Unconditional offers are almost always made to those that already have their grades.
With regards to the 3 A's students, there are probably ten times as many people got 3 A's as there are places at Oxbridge, so they shouldn't expect to get in. Most people that actually end up in Oxford/Cambridge have multiple A*'s in their A-level results.
It's the same thing here at Imperial - although most offers were A*AA or AAA a lot of people here have at least 4 A-levels with at least 2A*'s. There are only a handful of courses that have AAB people in them.
And a lot have gone the other way. Check out the maths department at Sheffield Hallam and I think you'll find its absolutely fantastic. Sure, it hasn't got the same academic output that the "better" universities have but they've got top-notch teaching, the best resources money can buy and most of their students go on to be very successful even though they didn't graduate from a "better" university.
Not really. Its using too much money, and the money has to come from somewhere, but who are we to decide which courses are useful and which aren't? Or who should go to university and who shouldn't?
|
||||
Luke Roach
|
||||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Interesting... so it will actually make the governments finances worse. What a clever government they are.
Some of us warned you before the election.
I agree with the article, and you wouldn't have to pay as much tax as you think. In return, everybody would have the right to further their education. And the country would be better for it.
Trouble is, it would take a government with guts.
|
||||
Hot_Charlie
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 1839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
That's my point, the departments that places have reputations for still tend to be rated as excellent (I'm a graduate of one of them), it's just they get lost in the mire mediocre courses now offered.
To big to be sustained in other words... Yes, in an ideal world everyone should have every opportunity. We don't live in an ideal world... |
||||
Hot_Charlie
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 1839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Tuition fees still apply to a foundation year.
Come on Martin, you know I know what we're referring to by "going to university". Unless A levels have got massively easier (lets not go there), then people are going there with quite poor A-levels. Back in the day I went with a C,D & E... Mis-spent yoof! There were fellow students on the campus who were straight in (no foundation years etc) with far worse (and not just those doing Alien Psychology with Applied Basket Weaving!). |
||||
Marmite
Chief Pilot Joined: 11 Apr 2008 Points: 1029 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
If people want to go to university, they should pay for it. If they can't afford to pay for it, they could always look at other options, scholarships, apprenticeships or working and starting uni as a mature student. There's more than one way to skin a cat
|
||||
Hot_Charlie
Chief Pilot Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Points: 1839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Can I get a degree in that? |
||||
roachy
Chief Pilot Joined: 03 May 2008 Location: London Points: 1038 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
But most people have to work really hard to get into university, and work really hard when they're there. Studying Fine Art at Oxford is more wishy-washy than studying Engineering at Lincoln yet if fees go up to £9000 it'll be those disadvantaged kids that would usually study at places like Lincoln that don't end up going to university, while the Fine Art students will just get their daddy to pay for it. Now this isn't stereotyping - something like 90% of Fine Art students at Oxford are private-schooled and less than 15% studying at Lincoln are, so for this particular example it holds.
|
||||
Luke Roach
|
||||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Tuition fees still apply to a foundation year.
So what? we were talking about qualifications required for a full degree. My point, is that we were discussing your claim that super low qualifications are all you need to get into uni. No, they aren't, you need more for a "full degree" at most universities, for most courses. And a full degree is what this debate is about.
Yes you can go to uni and do a foundation degree, with lower qualifications, but thats an extra TWO years of study. And at the end of it, it's not as universally applicable.
Plus you would be paying extra, a foundation degree plus a full honors degree, with the associated extra cost thanks to the Conservatives.
Foundation degrees focus on a particular job or profession. They are intended to increase the professional and technical skills of current or potential staff within a profession, or intending to go into that profession.
Therefore, considering that many students don't adopt a career thats at all related to the degree they studied, a foundation degree is limiting.
A foundation degree is the equivalent of two thirds of a full honours degree.
Come on Martin, you know I know what we're referring to by "going to university". Unless A levels have got massively easier (lets not go there), then people are going there with quite poor A-levels.
I assumed, like I think probably everyone else, when you claimed 40 ucas points were enough, that you were referring to a "full honours degree" and not a foundation degree or special scheme.
"Going to university", and getting a qualification that is just two thirds of a degree, is not what most in this thread had in mind.
|
||||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
then people are going there with quite poor A-levels.
My son is at university, my daughter will be going to university and has just signed up with UCAS. And no, in our first hand experience, those going to university to study for a full honors dergree... will require decent A-Levels. Of course there will be foundation degrees, and special schemes, and it will vary dependent on course and university, but generally speaking, no, I disagree.
My daughter is projected to have reasonable A-Level results, not superb but not bad either. But far above the 40 UCAS points you cliam... and she is struggling to find a university.
And you can absolutely guarantee, that now the Conservatives have taken this step... it will be even more competitive to get a place at university. With fewer places, entry requirement will rise further. That fact, plus the enormous cost, will prevent a considerable number form going to university.
Couple that with the fact that these measures will actually cost the government even more, due to the fact that 40% of students won't earn enough to pass the payback threshold... and the measures are ludicrous.
|
||||
roachy
Chief Pilot Joined: 03 May 2008 Location: London Points: 1038 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
But they're still having to work hard to get there, and while they're there. University isn't for clever people - its for people that want to be there, for those willing to try, and for those that it'll actually make a difference to.
Odd isn't it how the tories are advocating making A-levels harder now even though it was them that made them easier in the first place? All that harder A-levels will do is crowd a lot of "marginal" students (ie those that have to work really really hard, and only just get the grades they need) out of going to university.
Which probably means that 40% will be paying back money which for a degree which hasn't even earned them enough in their life to justify going to university in the first place (indeed, they won't be paying it all back but they'll certainly be paying some of it back).
I dread the day when Gove really starts to get involved in education matters. He is one of the few people in the world that I would genuinely, given the chance, hit in the face with a baseball bat. He's apparently from a more "working-class" background than the rest of the (diamond-encruseted) cabinet but seems just as clueless as Gideon whenever it comes to serious matters.
|
||||
Luke Roach
|
||||
roachy
Chief Pilot Joined: 03 May 2008 Location: London Points: 1038 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
We do pay for it. We already pay an awful lot for it, in fact.
Apprenticeships? Seriously? If I was poor and wanted to do physics what could I get an apprenticeship in? Starting as a mature student just won't work for most people because they won't be able to save enough for it. Right now universities cost about £8000-£10000 a year, and if you start work straight out of sixth-form you'll never be on more than £20k even if you work every hour god sends. Deduct tax and living costs and you can probably save about £5000 a year if you're lucky (and have a bit of support frokm the parents maybe), meaning you'd have to work for about 5 years just to pay for university. Would you even be still interested in pursuing academic after spending that long working?
|
||||
Luke Roach
|
||||
roachy
Chief Pilot Joined: 03 May 2008 Location: London Points: 1038 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
No, I never said that. It's using too much money, but there are other ways to stop this rather than just cutting numbers. The whole idea of government is to try and make a more ideal world is it not? |
||||
Luke Roach
|
||||
MartinW
Moderator in Command Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Location: United Kingdom Points: 26722 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Incidentally, how does the Scottish system work? Have any on your friends considered going north of the border Luke?
|
||||
Post Reply | Page <12345> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |